![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
akjeThe argument here once again is: are people more talented and unique than A.I.?
The answer, though, doesn't matter. The author never bothers to ask the real question: will employers care that humans are superior if they can make more money by replacing those superior humans with inferior A.I.?
And the answer to this, of course, is NO. Employers are goddamn greedy.
So why are all those tradwives and Hollywood celebrities breeding like vermin instead of sustainably? I'd really like to know where the wisdom is in creating a whole generation of unemployed homeless people...
(ノ-_-)ノ ︵ ┻━┻
The answer, though, doesn't matter. The author never bothers to ask the real question: will employers care that humans are superior if they can make more money by replacing those superior humans with inferior A.I.?
And the answer to this, of course, is NO. Employers are goddamn greedy.
So why are all those tradwives and Hollywood celebrities breeding like vermin instead of sustainably? I'd really like to know where the wisdom is in creating a whole generation of unemployed homeless people...
(ノ-_-)ノ ︵ ┻━┻
Tags: